Will this be, “Different Pockets On The Same Pants?”

Will this be, “Different Pockets On The Same Pants?”


Share this post

HOUSTON — Everything is bigger in Texas, including the shock of this win. On November 3, Gina Hinojosa defeated three-term Republican Governor Greg Abbott and became the first Latina and the first Democrat to hold the office since Ann Richards. James Talarico defeated Ken Paxton for the U.S. Senate. Democrats also took lieutenant governor, attorney general, and comptroller. The same night, Keisha Lance Bottoms became the first Black woman elected governor of any U.S. state when she won in Georgia.

President Trump responded by posting a red hat with one word on it: VETO.

What happened

•  Hinojosa won roughly 53 percent to Abbott’s 46 percent in a state no Democrat had carried statewide in more than thirty years.

•  Talarico won the Senate seat by a clear margin over Paxton.

•  Exit polling showed 57 percent of voters disapproved of ICE’s handling of immigration enforcement, 76 percent disapproved of data-center development in their communities, and more than 90 percent said corruption was a major factor in their vote.

•  Latino and young voters moved toward Democrats in numbers large enough to decide the races.

•  Nationally, Democrats took control of both the House and the Senate. Hakeem Jeffries is positioned to become the first Black Speaker of the House.

Who did it The people of Texas did it. Hinojosa and Talarico centered affordability, public schools, corruption, and the cost of living—the issues voters said mattered. Abbott and Paxton had the money, the incumbency, and the national machinery. The voters had the ballots. In Georgia, Bottoms did the same work against a well-funded opponent. In both states the decisive margin came from people who decided the status quo was more expensive than change.

Different pockets on the same pants Trump’s VETO hat is the warning. A new governor and a new senator can pass laws. A president who still holds the veto can block them. A Democratic Congress can pass bills. The same president can refuse to sign them. If the only change is the name on the door while the same structural barriers remain, the result is different pockets on the same pants. The people who voted for lower costs, better schools, and less corruption will have the same outcomes they had before if the new officials do not deliver and if the public does not stay engaged after the cameras leave.

What engagement is required

•  In Texas: Watch the first session. Demand concrete action on property taxes, school funding, and utility costs. Do not treat the win as the finish line.

•  Across the country: Hold the new congressional majority to the affordability and corruption messages that won the night. A Speaker and a majority are tools, not trophies.

•  Black people nationwide: Georgia’s result is proof that concentrated, consistent voting still moves power. Texas shows the same principle works when Latino and young voters join the effort. The task is to treat every midterm and every local race with the same seriousness used on November 3, then to stay in the room after the vote is counted.

•  Everyone: Track the vetoes. If the new majorities pass measures the public asked for and those measures die on the president’s desk, the public has to decide whether to accept the blockage or to raise the political cost of it.

The money was spent. The people voted. The results are on the board. Whether these victories remain different pockets on the same pants depends on what happens in the next legislative sessions, the next veto messages, and the next election cycles. Texas showed the size of the possibility. The rest of the country now has to decide whether it will match the engagement that produced it.

From Third Ward to the rest of the state, the work does not end when the results are called.


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong